Frequently Asked Questions


Parents that get referred for one of these Child Custody Evaluations are often already entrenched in significant custody disagreements or litigation. They are often apprehensive, and prone to view the assessing psychologist less as someone who is there to help, but yet another person who might potentially stand in the way of them having custody of their children.


Below is a list of commonly asked questions by parents who are just starting out in this process - or also parents who may be from other jurisdictions.

The more concisely the Clinician can explain the process, and what is involved, the better is the chance that there will not be any allegations of "misunderstandings".


Question:   What is involved in a 730 Evaluation?                           
 
Answer:   In most cases, a 730 evaluation will consist of several interviews as well as psychological testing. Interviews are conducted with all adults involved with the child, including parents, stepparents and sometimes other relatives who have significant roles in the child's life. Psychological testing provides an additional source of information that cannot be obtained through interviews alone.
Some psychologists do their own psychological testing, while others will refer that portion of the evaluation to a professional who is experienced in psychological assessment. The testing is done to describe the personalities and family dynamics, and to find any potential mental health or parenting problems.
With very young children, interviews are conducted as play sessions. Young children can express themselves more clearly through the action of play, or play sessions, more so than through conversations. Play sessions are a common practice found in "play therapy" under the observance of a trained and licensed therapist.
Usually several interviews are necessary, especially those that involve the child. Since circumstantial factors (such as custody exchanges and adjustment time, moods, illness, etc.) can have temporary effects on ones behavior. Multiple interviews help differentiate between temporary oscillations in ones behavior and what are continuing personality traits and/or characteristics.
In special circumstances, a custody evaluation may involve visits to the home, often called a "home visit", and/or school. These are not always necessary and in some cases can be initiated by the request of one or both of the parents.

Question:  Why does the Court order a 730 Evaluation?

Answer:   A 730 evaluation usually arises when parties (parents) are unable to decide or do not see eye-to-eye on what each believes to be the best custody arrangement. One parent cannot simply go to court and present an individual side of the argument in hopes of a ruling in their favor. There must be evidence to support a position and a judge, not knowing the family, will depend on the opinion of an "evaluator" to describe the parties involved and the nature of their interaction.
Question:  How does a 730 Evaluation come about?

Answer:   A 730 custody evaluation can come about or occur by the following methods:

  1. By "stipulation", or agreed to by the parties and their attorneys
  2. Requested by either party (parent) in a custody dispute, subject to approval by a judge
  3. Ordered by a judge


Question:  Who are the "Family, it’s Members, and/or Prospective Members"?

Answer:  The family is usually the blood family members such as the parents and child.
Other family members and individuals who have played a substantial role in the raising, nurturing, up bringing, and/or day-to-day activities of the children will also be of interest to the evaluator. For example, the children’s grandparent(s), stepparent(s), uncle(s), aunt(s), etc.
Prospective members of the family or members that may potentially play a substantial role in the raising, nurturing, up bringing, and/or day-to-day activities of the children will also be of interest to the evaluator. For example, this may include a parent’s fiancé/fianceé, girlfriend/boyfriend, etc.


Question:   Who is the "Evaluator"?

Answer:   The custody evaluation is conducted by a qualified mental health professional. The qualifications include having the right training and experience set forth by the state. Qualified persons to conduct evaluations can include a Licensed Clinical Psychologist, licensed psychiatrist, Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT), Marriage, Family, and Child Counselor (MFCC), or Licensed Clinical Social Worker (LCSW).
If there is any psychological testing to be done, and there usually is, the professional must be qualified to administer, score, and interpret the psychological test. This would usually be done by a Psychologist rather than a psychiatrist because this is a normal part of a psychologist's training.
  1. 2005 California Rules of Court Rule 5.220 - Court-ordered child custody evaluations.
  2. 2005 California Rules of Court Rule 5.225 - Education, experience, and training standards for court-appointed child custody investigators and evaluators. 
  3. 2005 California Rules of Court Rule 5.215 - Domestic violence training standards for court-appointed child custody investigators and evaluators. 
  4. California Family Code Section 3110-3118 

Regardless of the type of professional appointed to conduct the evaluation, that person is likely to be bound to certain business and professions codes and ethical standards.

In the case of psychologists, especially if they are members of the American Psychological Association (APA), they are bound to the Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct outlined and set forth by the American Psychological Association (APA).

As another example, a child custody evaluator who is licensed by the Medical Board of California, the Board of Psychology, or the Board of Behavioral Sciences shall be subject to disciplinary action by that board for unprofessional conduct, as defined in the licensing law applicable to that licensee.

  1. Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct.
  2. Guidelines for Child Custody Evaluations in Divorce Proceedings 
  3. California Business and Professions Code 
  4. Association of Family and Conciliation Courts (AFCC) 

Question:  How is the Evaluator selected?

Answer:  A child custody Evaluator is most often selected or appointed to conduct an evaluation by one of the following methods listed below:

  1. The judge may chose the evaluator from a list the court maintains
  2. The judge will ask the parties to submit a list of acceptable evaluators from which he or she will choose
  3. With the help of the attorneys in the case who know various evaluators and their reputation in the community, the two sides will mutually agree on an evaluator

However, the selection process can become complicated and is often looked at by the attorneys as strategic. This is because some evaluators are considered to be "neutral" or unbiased, while others may be seen as pro-father or pro-mother. Some have gained a reputation for their thorough evaluations and others are looked at as too hasty, as some evaluators can take months to complete an evaluation, and some might finish in several weeks.

These considerations should and most likely will be weighed by the two sides, and play into the negotiations that may take place either between the two attorneys, or alternatively during a court hearing. Of course, each side hopes to get the evaluator who they believe will be in their favor, and that may prolong the selection process.

If you are a party to the proceedings and you get to have some say in the matter, it would be wise to get information and educate yourself about the evaluators you are considering. For instance, evaluators in most cases should be willing to provide a copy of their resume or curriculum vitae, to an attorney, which can give you the opportunity to learn more about them. Your attorney may also want to ask the evaluators some pertinent questions, thereby hopefully satisfying your needs and requests. For example, it may be of interest to ask the evaluator’s view on joint-custody and if he/she believes that a Father is equally capable of raising and nurturing a child, even an a very young age (under 6 months old, under 12 months old).
 
Question:  What factors does an "Evaluator" consider in determining what he/she believes to be in the "child’s best interest"?

Answer: 
  The evaluation is supposed to determine what is in the overall
"best interest of the child";. That is the golden rule in all jurisdictions in the United States, and it is supposed to serve as the premise for the judge's custody and/or visitation order and evaluators recommendation. However, what is and is not in the child’s best interest is very subjective both from a legal and psychological perspective.

In order to answer the question of what is in the child’s best interest, an evaluation will usually be carried out in several phases and over a period of time (which can be several weeks or several months). It is common, though not necessarily obligatory, that the evaluation process includes the following parts:

  1. Initial interview of each parent
  2. Observation of parents interaction with the child (often in the form of play sessions)
  3. Psychological testing (includes tests performed on both parents and the child)
  4. Interviews of third parties, such as family friends, teachers, therapists, counselors, and/or doctors.
  5. Observation of other family members and/or third parties and their interaction with the child (often in the form of play sessions)
  6. Review of reports and other information provided to or obtained by the evaluator
  7. Home visit

Question: What happens after the Evaluation?


Answer:  After completion of the evaluation, the evaluator writes up and submits a report to the court or judge and to the two attorneys representing the parents. This is usually done early enough before the hearing in which the report will be considered, giving the parties time to examine the report and to consider and/or make any necessary objections. (The time line is regulated and varies depending on the court rules and procedures in your jurisdiction).


If the report is acceptable to both parties, the parties can agree to accept it in its entirety into evidence. If there are disagreements, the parties will have a chance to argue their points in regards to the findings found in the report and challenge its recommendations.

Upon receiving the report, most judges give heavy weight and consideration to the recommendations and findings of the evaluator found and submitted in the report. Since the judge is the ultimate authority in making an order and not the evaluator, they can use their judicial discretion to give as much weight as they decide to the report when making a final order.

In considering the report, the judge is also likely to consider whether the data contained within the report is convincing and whether the evaluation was executed fairly. Also, consideration as to whether or not the data found in the report passes the measure of what would be considered "beyond reasonable doubt", a family law criteria. Other judicial considerations are whether the evaluator used acceptable methods, and whether their conclusions logically reflect the data in the report.

In addition, the judge will listen to and may consider any inconsistencies between the data in the report and other evidence brought to light in the case. Ultimately, in considering the report, the judge’s decision must be based on the what is considered to be in the
child’s best interest.

Question:  What if I disagree with the Evaluation report?


Answer: If either of the parties (parents or attorneys) is not satisfied with the evaluation report, and its recommendations, they may depose the evaluator, and/or have the evaluator placed on the witness stand for cross-examination.


If one does challenge the evaluation report, it may be beneficial to seek out the opinion of an outside expert or mental health professional to review and critique the evaluation process and have this placed into a formal declaration written up by your attorney. Also, the expert will need to be prepared to be cross-examined at trial. The expert should evaluate the methods used by the evaluator, the conclusions drawn from the data, and the validity of the evaluators recommendations, and report their findings within the declaration.

 

Article provided by Child Custody CoachTM. Permission granted.
Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software